Research

What the evidence says about focus and productivity

Plain-language summaries of the studies behind how we think about time, breaks, interruptions and planning. Each one links to its source and carries a rating for how much weight the evidence can bear.

Strong evidence
Multiple meta-analyses or many randomized trials agree.
Moderate evidence
Randomized trials or field experiments, but few or small.
Emerging or mixed
One or two studies, or conflicting results.
Weak evidence
Failed replications, correlational only, or mostly marketing.
Background
An explainer or investigation rather than a study.

Work intervals and breaks

Planned, timer-driven breaks reliably reduce fatigue; the exact 25/5 ratio matters far less than having a structure at all.

Interruptions and task switching

Cutting the number of interruptions is one of the best-supported levers for focus, and how you leave a task matters almost as much as how often you are pulled away.

Planning and self-regulation

Specific if-then plans and visible progress records are among the best-evidenced tools for getting focused work done.

Training attention

Mindfulness practice has consistent randomized evidence behind it; commercial brain-training games mostly make people better at the games.

Body and environment

Sleep has by far the largest effect on sustained attention; movement, nature and sound are smaller, cheap levers best used inside breaks.

Digital habits

The newest causal evidence suggests that reducing always-on mobile internet improves sustained attention within weeks.

Myths and weak claims

Popular focus claims that turn out to be unsupported or overstated when you trace them back to the evidence.

Stop losing an evening to invoicing

Track your hours on your phone or desktop. On the first of the month, your clients get their invoices. Free on every device, no account needed to start — we only take 1% when an invoice is paid online.